Diagnosis and Treatment of Posterior Deformational Plagiocephaly:
A Randomized, Prospective Analysis

Holly S. Gilmer-Hill, M.D.
Principal Investigator
Since the American Academy of Pediatrics 1992 recommendation that, to avoid sudden infant death, infants no longer be placed prone to sleep, babies have increasingly been referred to neurosurgeons for flattening of the occiput, or occipital plagiocephaly. This condition is also known as posterior deformational plagiocephaly, or positional molding. It is by definition non-synostotic, as it results not from a prematurely-closed suture but from positioning the child supine or prenatal constrictive forces on the head within the uterus. Once flattened on one side or the other, the head tends to roll to that side, and maintain the deformity. Associated subsequent facial deformities include prominence of the ipsilateral forehead, anterior displacement of the ipsilateral ear, and prominence of the ipsilateral malar eminence. Occipital plagiocephaly has traditionally been treated by actively changing the baby's sleeping position, along with physical therapy. Frequently, the use of a contouring helmet has been added to this regimen, until the baby's head shape becomes symmetric. Success in reshaping the head has been reported with both approaches, but there have been no prospective, randomized studies comparing the use of the helmet to positional changes and physical therapy alone. Accordingly, third-party insurance payers are frequently reluctant to pay for the helmet, which, although shown in numerous studies to be effective, has not been demonstrated to be superior to positional and physical therapy in a prospective, randomized trial. The aims of the study are therefore: (1) To determine whether there is any difference in the outcome of occipital plagiocephaly with the use of molding helmets in addition to positional and physical therapy; (2) To determine if plain skull radiographs are adequate to distinguish between synostotic and non-synostotic plagiocephaly, or if computed tomography is necessary to make the diagnosis.

The study population currently includes 50 infants between the ages of 0 and 6 months of age, diagnosed with non-synostotic occipital plagiocephaly. The diagnosis will be made by clinical examination, plain skull radiographs (Townes and lateral views), and 3-dimensional CT. Parents will give informed consent for participation in the study. The patients will be randomized to either a helmet group or a non-helmet group. Measurements of head width at the widest point (eu-eu), temple-temple forehead width (ft-ft) to skull base index, head circumference, and diameters of the long vs. short axes of the head will be taken initially, after 2 months of treatment, after 6 months of treatment, and after an additional 1 year of follow-up (18 months after enrollment in the study). Measurements will be taken with sliding calipers, measuring tape, and CT. The same measurements will be taken of 60 normocephalic infants ages 0-6 months for comparison. These normal infants will be children born full-term at Hutzel Hospital, without any perinatal problems. They will not undergo any radiographic studies, and their hospital stay will not be prolonged for the taking of skull measurements. However, they will be seen again and have cranial measurements taken at their scheduled well-baby visits (18 months). Three-dimensional CT will be performed on the plagiocephalic patients initially and after 18 months to assess changes in skull base angulation and asymmetry. The patients in the helmet and non-helmet groups will receive identical courses of physical therapy, and these parents will be instructed to keep the child's head positioned on the contralateral side when supine. Children with torticollis will receive cervical spine xrays to rule out vertebral abnormalities, as well as ophthalmologic evaluation for trochlear nerve palsy. If a patient randomized to the non-helmet or no-treatment arms shows a worsening head shape after 2 months, he/she will be changed to the helmet group. They will then be seen 1 year later for follow-up and post-treatment CT. Patient (parent) and surgeon satisfaction will be recorded at that time as 1) Very satisfied, 2) Somewhat satisfied, or 3) Unsatisfied. The 6-month data are currently being analyzed.