| Home > Goshgarian's
Home Page > Research > Past
Research
Past Research
The 1998 Botsford Theophylline
Case Study
This study
was a result of many years of work in animal research by Dr. Goshgarian,
intensive work with pharmacologists and extensive review and approval
by the Internal Review Board (Human Investigation Committee) and
clinicians at Botsford Hospital. The drug used in this study, theophylline,
has been used for years for asthma and bronchitis patients to open
airways and, therefore, has already undergone extensive scrutiny
for human use.
The patient participating in this study spent the whole day at
Botsford Hospital working with the team that was comprised of:

(left to right) patient, Dr. Ferguson,
Chris Lattin,
Dr. Khanchandani and Dr. Goshgarian.
Harry Goshgarian,
Ph.D.
Dr. Goshgarian developed this type of study in animals and
he coordinates the various activities that take place during this
process. Gary Ferguson, M.D.
Dr. Ferguson was a physician from the Pulmonary
Division at Botsford. This clinical study was conducted in
Dr. Ferguson's clinical research laboratory at Botsford Hospital.
Dr. Ferguson is currently in private clinical practice.
Chris
Lattin, B.S., RRT.
Chris. Lattin was the respiratory
therapist who hooked the patient up to the equipment and instructed
the patient on what to do during the breathing tests.
Narendra Khanchandani,
M.D.
Dr. Khanchandani was a resident working
with Dr. Ferguson on this and other pulmonary research projects.
He is currently a staff pulmonologist at the VA hospital in Detroit,
Michigan.
First, the participant was transferred to a hospital bed and made
comfortable. She was “hooked up” by muscle
recording electrodes that were simply pasted on the patient's chest
(there is no need to stick needles into the muscles). A
blood sample was taken to confirm the absence of theophylline (or
caffeine which is in the same drug family as theophylline: patient
was instructed not to consume caffeine-containing products; i.e.
coffee, tea, coke, etc. 24 hours prior to testing).
After the electrodes were in place, "baseline" breathing
tests were carried out. These are straightforward and most
simply described as "breathing through a tube placed in the
patient's mouth." The breathing tests are completely painless
and are easy to perform.
After the baseline breathing tests were completed, theophylline was
administered intravenously. After about 1.5 hours, another
blood sample was taken (to confirm that the medicine is at the correct "therapeutic" level),
and then another series of breathing tests were carried out. The "pre-drug" tests
were then compared with the "post-drug" tests.
In a different experiment, after the "pre-drug" breathing
tests were taken, the patient was asked to take theophylline at home
for approximately one month. After this time, the patient returned
to the lab for post-drug testing.
Dr. Goshgarian reviews with the participant the activities to take
place. Basically, what happened was this:
- A baseline blood sample was taken
- The patient was directed to blow in
a tube
- Theophylline was administered
- Pulmonary tests were repeated
|
 |

While the study was fairly straightforward, time is needed to process
the blood samples and interpret the computer readouts. One
of the very positive things about this study was that by the
end of
the
session, preliminary results were available and we could
determine whether or not the drug was helpful.
|